Steel, Z. et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int. J. Epidemiol. 43, 476–493 (2014).
Google Scholar
Vigo, D., Thornicroft, G. & Atun, R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 3, 171–178 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C. et al. Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 20, 359–364 (2007).
Google Scholar
Ford, T., Collishaw, S., Meltzer, H. & Goodman, R. A prospective study of childhood psychopathology: independent predictors of change over three years. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 42, 953–961 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sadler, K. et al. Mental health of children and young people in England, 2017. Trends and characteristics. (2018).
Cuddy, E. & Currie, J. Treatment of mental illness in American adolescents varies widely within and across areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24039–24046 (2020).
Google Scholar
Radež, J. et al. Why do children and adolescents (not) seek and access professional help for their mental health problems? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 30, 183–211 (2020).
Google Scholar
Brody, C., Star, A. & Tran, J. Chat-based hotlines for health promotion: a systematic review. mHealth 6, 36 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mathieu, S. et al. Systematic Review: The State of Research into Youth Helplines. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 60, 1190–1233 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hoermann, S., McCabe, K., Milne, D. & Calvo, R. A. Application of Synchronous Text-Based Dialogue Systems in Mental Health Interventions: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e267 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kramer, J., Conijn, B., Oijevaar, P. & Riper, H. Effectiveness of a Web-Based Solution-Focused brief chat treatment for depressed adolescents and young adults: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 16, e141 (2014).
Google Scholar
Erşahin, Z. & Hanley, T. Using text-based synchronous chat to offer therapeutic support to students: A systematic review of the research literature. Health Educ. J. 76, 531–543 (2017).
Google Scholar
Eckert, M. et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a messenger-based psychological chat counselling service for children and young adults (“krisenchat”): A cross-sectional study. Internet Inter. 27, 100508 (2022).
Google Scholar
Baldofski, S. et al. The impact of a Messenger-Based Psychosocial Chat Counseling Service on Further Help-Seeking among Children and young Adults: longitudinal study. JMIR Ment. Health 10, e43780 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cross, S., & Hickie, I. B. Transdiagnostic stepped care in mental health. Public Health Res Pract. 27 (2017).
Nadkarni, P. M., Ohno-Machado, L. & Chapman, W. W. Natural language processing: an introduction. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18, 544–551 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Schoene, A. M., Ji, S., & Ananiadou, S. Natural language processing applied to mental illness detection: a narrative review. Npj Digit. Med. 5, (2022).
Rumshisky, A. et al. Predicting early psychiatric readmission with natural language processing of narrative discharge summaries. Transl. Psychiatry 6, e921 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhong, Q. et al. Screening pregnant women for suicidal behavior in electronic medical records: diagnostic codes vs. clinical notes processed by natural language processing. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 18 (2018).
Levis, M., Westgate, C. L., Gui, J., Watts, B. V. & Shiner, B. Natural language processing of clinical mental health notes may add predictive value to existing suicide risk models. Psychol. Med. 51, 1382–1391 (2020).
Google Scholar
Koleck, T. A. et al. Identifying symptom information in clinical notes using natural language processing. Nurs. Res. 70, 173–183 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Symptom-based patient stratification in mental illness using clinical notes. J. Biomed. Inform. 98, 103274 (2019).
Google Scholar
Calvo, R. A., Milne, D., Hussain, M. S. & Christensen, H. Natural language processing in mental health applications using non-clinical texts. Nat. Lang. Eng. 23, 649–685 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tanana, M. et al. How do you feel? Using natural language processing to automatically rate emotion in psychotherapy. Behav. Res. Methods 53, 2069–2082 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ryu, J. et al. A natural language processing approach to modelling treatment alliance in psychotherapy transcripts. BJPsych Open, 7, (2021).
Althoff, T., Clark, K. & Leskovec, J. Large-scale Analysis of Counseling Conversations: An application of natural language processing to Mental health. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 4, 463–476 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pacula, M., Meltzer, T., Crystal, M., Srivastava, A., & Marx, B. P. Automatic detection of psychological distress indicators and severity assessment in crisis hotline conversations. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. (2014).
Xu, Z. et al. Detecting suicide risk using knowledge-aware natural language processing and counseling service data. Soc. Sci. Med. 283, 114176 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pandey, S., Sharma, S. & Wazir, S. Mental healthcare chatbot based on natural language processing and deep learning approaches: Ted the therapist. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 14, 3757–3766 (2022).
Bharti, U. et al. Medbot: Conversational Artificial Intelligence Powered Chatbot for Delivering Tele-Health after COVID-19. International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems. (2020).
Denecke, K., Abd-Alrazaq, A., & Househ, M. Artificial intelligence for chatbots in mental health: opportunities and challenges. Multiple perspectives on artificial intelligence in healthcare: Opportunities and challenges, 115-128 (2021).
Efe, Z. et al. Who are Frequent Chatters? Characterization of Frequent Users in a 24/7 Messenger-Based Psychological Chat Counseling Service for Children and Adolescents. Internet. Interv. (2023).
Pirkis, J. et al. Frequent callers to telephone helplines: new evidence and a new service model. Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 10, (2016).
Thapar, A. et al. Rutter’s Child and adolescent Psychiatry. Wiley eBooks. (2015).
Ryan, R., Berry, K. & Hartley, S. Review: Therapist factors and their impact on therapeutic alliance and outcomes in child and adolescent mental health – a systematic review. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 28, 195–211 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hornstein, S., Zantvoort, K., Lueken, U., Funk, B. & Hilbert, K. Personalization strategies in digital mental health interventions: a systematic review and conceptual framework for depressive symptoms. Front. Digit. Health 5, 1170002 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mohr, D. C. et al. A randomized noninferiority trial evaluating remotely-delivered stepped care for depression using internet cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and telephone CBT. Behav. Res. Ther. 123, 103485 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. & Lee, S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 4768–4777 (2017).
Lundberg, S., Erion, G., & Lee, S. Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv. (2018).
Mosca, E., Szigeti, F., Tragianni, S., Gallagher, D., & Groh, G. SHAP-based explanation methods: a review for NLP interpretability. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (2022).
Zantvoort, K., Scharfenberger, J., Boß, L., Lehr, D., & Funk, B. Finding the Best Match—a Case Study on the (Text-) Feature and Model Choice in Digital Mental Health Interventions. J. Healthc. Inform. Res. 1-33 (2023).
Cook, B. L. et al. Novel use of natural Language processing (NLP) to predict suicidal ideation and psychiatric symptoms in a Text-Based Mental Health intervention in Madrid. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 8708434, (2016).
Funk, B. et al. A framework for applying natural language processing in digital health interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e13855 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sajjadian, M. et al. Machine learning in the prediction of depression treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 51, 2742–2751 (2021).
Google Scholar
Vieira, S., Liang, X., Guiomar, R. & Mechelli, A. Can we predict who will benefit from cognitive-behavioural therapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 97, 102193 (2022).
Google Scholar
Symons, M. et al. learning vs addiction therapists: A pilot study predicting alcohol dependence treatment outcome from patient data in behavior therapy with adjunctive medication. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 99, 156–162 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Q., Chen, Z., Cao, Y., & Peng, S. Clinical impact and quality of randomized controlled trials involving interventions evaluating artificial intelligence prediction tools: a systematic review. Npj Digit. Med. 4, (2021).
Biyani, P., Caragea, C., Mitra, P., & Yen, J. Identifying emotional and informational support in online health communities. International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 827–836 (2014).
Jiang, Z. et al. “Low-Resource” Text Classification: A Parameter-Free Classification Method with Compressors. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. (2023).
Straw, I. & Callison-Burch, C. Artificial Intelligence in mental health and the biases of language based models. PLoS One 15, e0240376 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lin, I. W. et al. Gendered mental health stigma in masked language models. arXiv (2022).
Tianqi, C. & Carlos, G. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 785–794 (2016)
Ramraj, S., Uzir, N., Sunil, R. & Banerjee, S. Experimenting XGBoost algorithm for prediction and classification of different datasets. IET Control Theory Appl 9, 651–662 (2016).
Dietterich, T. G. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Comput 10, 1895–1923 (1998).
Google Scholar
Head, T., Kumar, M., Nahrstaedt, H., Louppe, G., & Shcherbatyi, I. scikit-optimize/scikit-optimize: v0. 8.1. Zenodo. (2020).
Ojala, M., & Garriga, G. C. Permutation Tests for Studying Classifier Performance. J. Mach. Learn. Res. (2010).
link